Luke Johnson vs Anton Matusevich Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L W L L L W L
Form
W W W L W L W W W LH2H: Johnson 2 - 2 Matusevich
They have played 9 sets in total, with Johnson winning 4 and Matusevich winning 5. The last match between Johnson and Matusevich was at the M15 Heraklion, 06-11-2019, First, Hard with Anton Matusevich getting the victory 7-6(1) 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Luke Johnson | 2 |
| Anton Matusevich | 2 |
M15 Heraklion(06-11-2019)
7
6
6
1
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bergs VS Nishioka PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Avanesyan VS Dolehide PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Johnson VS Matusevich H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 6-1 |
Stats 
Anton Matusevich
Player
Luke Johnson
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 7-6(3) 6-4 |
Stats
Luke Johnson
Player
Anton Matusevich
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| 5-7 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Luke Johnson
Player
Anton Matusevich
55%
(
56 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
7
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
39 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| 6-3 7-6(5) | |||||
Johnson VS Matusevich H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 46 | Games Won | 48 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 12 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 1:13:30 | Average Match Time | 1:13:30 |
| 57% (141/246) | 1st Serve % | 62% (140/227) |
| 66% (93/141) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (98/140) |
| 50% (53/105) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (44/87) |
| 53% (9/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 57% (8/14) |
| 37% (85/227) | Return Points Win % | 41% (100/246) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (1/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (3/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (3/1) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Luke Johnson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Luke Johnson
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luke Johnson
Player
Stefanos Sakellaridis
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
8
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
47 of
65)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Luke Johnson
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
87%
(
20 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Luke Johnson
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
15
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yannick Mertens
Player
Luke Johnson
74%
(
99 of
134)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
7
Aces
20
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
55 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
96)
112
Total Points Won
118
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luke Johnson
Player
Virgile Le Bourjois
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomaz Bellucci
Player
Luke Johnson
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alberto Barroso Campos
Player
Luke Johnson
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elliot Benchetrit
Player
Luke Johnson
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Luke Johnson
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
14
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Anton Matusevich Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Anton Matusevich
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
10
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Lucas Poullain
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Stuart Parker
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Toby Samuel
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
3
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Anton Matusevich
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Szymon Kielan
67%
(
81 of
121)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
109)
2
Aces
20
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
38 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
36 of
109)
119
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(9) 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Anton Matusevich
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Norbert Gombos
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
80%
(
57 of
71)
11
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
0
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Dino Prizmic
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Jules Marie
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
11
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (156/130) | Win/Loss | 62% (167/103) |
| 53% (349/308) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (378/259) |
| 52% (3160/2887) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3267/2936) |
| 56% (103/80) | Hard Win/Loss | 64% (45/25) |
| 64% (16/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (35/27) |
| 52% (34/32) | Indoor Hard W/L | 65% (82/44) |
| 25% (3/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 42% (5/7) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 596 | Aces Total | 1347 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 750 | Total Double Faults | 788 |
| 1:9:6 | Average Match Time | 1:32:5 |
| 493.98 | Average Opponent Rank | 476.06 |
| 59% (8364/14139) | 1st Serve % | 58% (10590/18189) |
| 66% (5546/8364) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (7749/10590) |
| 47% (2723/5775) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3854/7597) |
| 43% (648/1508) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (729/1837) |
| 42% (5864/14071) | Return Points Win % | 39% (7444/18993) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 21% (5/19) | Challenger W/L | 48% (15/16) |
| 58% (151/111) | Futures W/L | 64% (150/83) |
| 54% (153/283) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (167/269) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 41% (29/70) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (53/99) |
| 55% (48/88) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (52/95) |
| 82% (155/127) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (165/139) |
| 18% (155/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (165/26) |
| 21% (131/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (105/28) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
